-
Wine Jobs
Assistant Manager
Assistant Cider Maker
Viticulture and Enology...
-
Wine Country Real Estates
Winery in Canada For Sale
-
Wine Barrels & Equipment
75 Gallon Stainless Steel...
Wanted surplus/ excess tin...
Winery Liquidation Auction...
-
Grapes & Bulk Wines
2022 Chardonnay
2023 Pinot Noir
2022 Pinot Noir
-
Supplies & Chemicals
Planting supplies
Stagg Jr. Bourbon - Batch 12
-
Wine Services
Wine
Sullivan Rutherford Estate
Clark Ferrea Winery
-
World Marketplace
Canned Beer
Wine from Indonesia
Rare Opportunity - Own your...
- Wine Jobs UK
- DCS Farms LLC
- ENOPROEKT LTD
- Liquor Stars
- Stone Hill Wine Co Inc
Scientists Find Wines from Different Terroirs Have Distinct 'Fingerprints'
May 1, 2015
(WineSpectator) - How tangible is terroir? Winemakers and wine drinkers love to discuss whether a particular patch of earth can speak through a wine. But can science actually prove such a connection?
A group of researchers at the University of California at Davis tried to do just that, and found that by analyzing the chemical composition of nearly identical wines from two different countries they could map distinct differences, creating a chemical fingerprint for two different terroirs. The findings not only add fuel to the terroir debate but may also provide a valuable tool for sniffing out counterfeit wines.
The study, led by enology professor Dr. Hildegarde Heymann and published in the journal Food Chemistry, aimed to determine if wines—in this case several Malbecs—created with identical vinification methods and aged for the same amount of time could be objectively identified by terroir. Can a Malbec from California be distinguished from one from Argentina other than by the best guesses of experienced tasters?
For the study, wines from 26 sites in Argentina and 15 in California were selected. The team tracked factors such as altitude, precipitation, growing days, rootstock, vine age and trellising systems employed. Winemaking was standardized: Fermenting juice remained on the skins for 11 days, and the resulting wine was not aged in oak. No acidification or filtration was used.
The researchers assembled a tasting panel at the U.C. Davis wine sensory lab and tracked how often tasters used 35 different descriptive attributes—words like “dark fruit,” “chocolate,” “herbal” and “viscous”—that could provide the makings of a flavor profile.
The team then analyzed all the wines with several methods, such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and selected ion monitoring, recording 60 individual chemical components found in the wines.
Comparing the chemical components to the sensory findings, the researchers ascertained direct relationships between smells and flavors the tasters detected and the compounds measured. The aroma of “spice” was linked with eugenol and 4-methylguaiacol. “Red fruit” was associated with α-terpinene, limonene and α-pinene. By mapping the sensory and chemical results, the scientists created a profile for each wine and terroir.
The study found a large degree of separation in flavor profiles between Malbecs from the two countries. Wine from the same country but different regions showed smaller differences. In the following chart, you can see the regions organized based on which smells, flavors and chemical components their wines contained.
Comments: