-
Wine Jobs
Assistant Manager
Assistant Cider Maker
Viticulture and Enology...
-
Wine Country Real Estates
Winery in Canada For Sale
-
Wine Barrels & Equipment
75 Gallon Stainless Steel...
Wanted surplus/ excess tin...
Winery Liquidation Auction...
-
Grapes & Bulk Wines
2022 Chardonnay
2023 Pinot Noir
2022 Pinot Noir
-
Supplies & Chemicals
Planting supplies
Stagg Jr. Bourbon - Batch 12
-
Wine Services
Wine
Sullivan Rutherford Estate
Clark Ferrea Winery
-
World Marketplace
Canned Beer
Wine from Indonesia
Rare Opportunity - Own your...
- Wine Jobs UK
- DCS Farms LLC
- ENOPROEKT LTD
- Liquor Stars
- Stone Hill Wine Co Inc
Online Wine Auctioneer Arrested on Embezzlement Charges
Jul 31, 2014
(WineSpectator) - Why go to the trouble of making and selling fake fine wine when you can convince other people to let you sell their real fine wine and pocket the cash? The founder and former president of an online auction house stands accused of just that. California prosecutors have indicted WineGavel founder Joshua Krummenoehl, charging him with 12 counts of grand theft by embezzlement, amounting to more than $500,000.
Krummenoehl was arrested July 8 in New York and extradited to Napa, where he was booked before posting $50,000 bail July 17. Krummenoehl could not be reached for comment.
According to an indictment filed by state prosecutors in a Napa court and obtained by Wine Spectator, Krummenoehl allegedly accepted wine to be sold through WineGavel's online auctions between Feb. 14, 2011, and April 1, 2012, took payment for the wines, but neglected to compensate the consignors. He also kept unsold wines.
“Within the first year of operation, 2009, Krummenoehl was aware that WineGavel did not have sufficient revenue to operate the business and used the consignors’ profits,” stated supervising inspector Carl Chapman of the Marin County district attorney's office in a declaration in support of an arrest warrant filed June 26 and obtained by Wine Spectator. (One of WineGavel's clients lives in Marin County. The indictment was filed in Napa County, where the firm stored wines for auction.)
“The evidence shows that when Krummenoehl solicited and accepted the consignments from the victims between February 2011 and March 2012, he had no intention of using the proceeds of the sales for its entrusted purpose,” Chapman said. “Krummenoehl knew by February of 2011 that the company’s debt to previous consignors was approximately $600,000 and growing. He knew that when he represented to the consigning victims that he would pay them as per their contracts for the wine sold at auction, he intended to unlawfully appropriate their money and wine for his own purpose.”
Comments: