-
Wine Jobs
Assistant Manager
Assistant Cider Maker
Viticulture and Enology...
-
Wine Country Real Estates
Winery in Canada For Sale
-
Wine Barrels & Equipment
75 Gallon Stainless Steel...
Wanted surplus/ excess tin...
Winery Liquidation Auction...
-
Grapes & Bulk Wines
2022 Chardonnay
2023 Pinot Noir
2022 Pinot Noir
-
Supplies & Chemicals
Planting supplies
Stagg Jr. Bourbon - Batch 12
-
Wine Services
Wine
Sullivan Rutherford Estate
Clark Ferrea Winery
-
World Marketplace
Canned Beer
Wine from Indonesia
Rare Opportunity - Own your...
- Wine Jobs UK
- DCS Farms LLC
- ENOPROEKT LTD
- Liquor Stars
- Stone Hill Wine Co Inc
Jewelry Vs. Wine: Cartier Sues Carter Cellars
May 1, 2014
(WS) - In what looks like a case of Goliath vs. David, Cartier the jeweler thinks that Carter the wine brand's label is too familiar-looking and is suing the Napa vintner to change its look. The famous jeweler and watchmaker, based in Switzerland, filed suit in U.S. District Court in California in October 2013, in effect asking vintner Mark Carter, owner of Carter Cellars, to change his label. Cartier believes the Carter trademark looks too much like Cartier’s and wants Carter Cellars to change its trademark font and color scheme.
Vintner Carter, who founded Carter Cellars in 1998 and is also the owner of a Wine Spectator Grand Award–winning restaurant, Restaurant 301 in Eureka, also known as the Carter House, says he has no intention of changing anything. He maintains the two logos don’t look the same and appear on products that appeal to different audiences. His winery makes about 1,500 cases of Napa Valley Cabernet, Merlot and blends.
Carter said Cartier first brought up the label issue in 2004, and then dropped the matter until about a year ago, when a new team of lawyers for the jeweler asked him to change the label. Carter is being defended by his insurance company, California Insurance Group.
Cartier's attorneys did not respond to requests for comment. Their complaint, filed this past October, claims the Carter name on the wine labels is too similar to Cartier in script style and color. "Defendants use of their confusingly similar Carter script mark is likely to confuse consumers into mistakenly believing that defendants' wine products are made, provided, authorized, endorsed or sponsored by Cartier." The jeweler has not asked for specific monetary damages, but asked the court to award it "such damages it has sustained or will sustain" due to trademark infringement and unfair competition.
Comments: